Learn
How to Evaluate AI Agents
Standard benchmarks measure capabilities in isolation. Effective evaluation tests how agents compose those capabilities in real-world task chains.
Why Standard Benchmarks Fall Short
Most agent benchmarks test single capabilities: code generation, question answering, or tool calling. But production agents must combine these capabilities across multi-step workflows. Evaluation needs to test the composition, not just the components.
Trace-Level Evaluation Over Output Scoring
Scoring only the final output misses where and why an agent failed. Trace-level evaluation inspects each step: Was the plan coherent? Did tool calls return correct results? Did the agent recover from errors? This granularity is essential for targeted improvement.
Building a Failure Taxonomy
Classifying failures by root cause — planning error, tool misuse, knowledge gap, or reasoning mistake — enables targeted fixes. A failure taxonomy turns vague quality complaints into actionable data engineering tasks.
Evaluation-Driven Data Improvement
The most effective evaluation loop connects diagnosis to data: identify failure modes, generate expert-labeled training data targeting those specific gaps, retrain, and verify the fix with regression tests. This is the closed loop that moves agents from benchmark competence to production reliability.
Domain-Specific Evaluation Considerations
Coding agents need repo-level evaluation across file boundaries. STEM agents need step-by-step reasoning verification by domain PhDs. Tool-use agents need multi-turn interaction testing. One-size-fits-all benchmarks cannot capture these domain-specific failure modes.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best way to evaluate AI agents?
The best evaluation combines trace-level analysis (inspecting each step, not just final output), a failure taxonomy (classifying root causes), and domain-specific test cases that reflect real-world task complexity. Output scoring alone misses most production failure modes.
How do you build an AI agent evaluation framework?
Start with real task traces from production or realistic simulations. Build a failure taxonomy classifying root causes (planning, tool use, knowledge, reasoning). Create evaluation sets targeting each failure mode. Use regression tests to verify fixes don't reintroduce old failures.
What metrics matter for AI agent evaluation?
Beyond task completion rate, track: step-level accuracy across multi-step chains, tool call correctness (not just format), plan coherence over long horizons, error recovery rate, and failure mode distribution. These metrics guide targeted improvement.
Build reliable AI agents.
From diagnosis to expert data to regression testing — we help frontier AI teams ship agents that work in production.
Talk to Us